DPC Home

GRASP implementering

GRASP Styregruppe

GRASP Forskningsplan

Et hav af muligheder

Den "juridiske kontinentalsokkel", et nyt begreb i international ret

Planer for ny dansk forskningsindsats i Polhavet

GRASP Science Plan

An ocean of possibilities

Related basic scientific interest in the Polar sea

The Juridical Continental Shelf a new term in international law

  Nordic Arctic Research Forum, January 1998

The Juridical Continental Shelf
- a new term in International Law

by Jørgen Taagholt
Danish Scientific Liaison Officer for Greenland
Danish Polar Center
Copenhagen

The United Nations Law of the Sea Convention
The United Nations started the Third Law of the Sea Conference in Caracas, Venezuela, in 1974, and the conference was not concluded until 1982. The freedom of the high seas has for a long period been the dominating principle, which was often misused. The technologically leading countries were using more and more of their advanced technology to vacuum clean the rich fishing areas on third countries' continental shelf. Leading mining companies started to develop a technique, which could utilise the mineral resources of the ocean floor. The non-equal division of resources and technological possibilities to utilise such resources caused a majority of countries, especially from the third world, to feel a need to protect their rights to the resources in their coastal area.

During this very long conference, several states extended their fishery or economic zones up to 200 nautical miles, so the conference had to face "creeping jurisdiction" as a fait accompli.

The new convention was formally accepted on December 10, 1982, although USA voted against and the Soviet Union abstained. The Danish Government, as one of 119 nations, signed the convention in December 1982. The convention then has to be ratified, which for Denmark and most of the democracies means , that the convention has to be presented and accepted by the different national parliaments.

The convention was in force on November 16, 1994, one year after its ratification by 60 nations. After an agreement was obtained in 1994 in order to solve problems related to international control of deep sea resources, most of the industrial world, including member nations of the European Union, started the ratification process.

The convention confirms the new established international law practice, under which a nation has the right to adjust the basic line, extend the territorial water from 3 to 12 nautical miles, establish a fishery zone up to 200 nautical miles and extend the fishery zone to an economic zone. This is defined as a zone, where the coastal state has exclusive rights to all living and nonliving resources and to utilise such resources as wave, current, wind energies, to control pollution and maritime research.

Danish claim for an exclusive economic zone
Based upon the Danish act no 411 of May 22, 1996, Denmark established an exclusive economic zone round Denmark. The act opens the possibility for administratively introducing an exclusive economic zone round the Faroe Islands and Greenland, when appropriate and when the local Home Rule Government has accepted such extension.

It is expected that Denmark/Greenland in 1998 will establish an exclusive economic zone round Greenland, giving the coastal state the right to all living and nonliving resources, and to such resources as wave, current, wind energies, and the control of pollution and maritime research.

The Juridical Continental Shelf
By ratifying the 1982 the Law of the Sea Convention the coastal state has additionally according to Article 76 of the Convention, a means of ensuring international recognition of its national sovereign rights and jurisdiction in the marine areas beyond the limits of the 200 nautical mile exclusive economic zone on a submerged prolongation of the the land mass.

In accordance with the Article 76 in the the new UN Law of the Sea Convention a new term "juridical continental shelf" has been defined. The "juridical continental shelf" differs from the physiographic continental shelf. The new term encompasses three physiographic components of the continental margin: shelf, slope and rise (fig. 1).


Fig. 1.

Definition of the juridical shelf
According to Article 76 the juridical shelf can be defined either by the distance formula or by the sediment thickness formula. If the distance formula is used, the outer limit of the juridical continental shelf is defined by fixed points 60 nautical miles from the foot of the continental slope, fig. 2.


Fig. 2.

If the sediment thickness formula is used, the outer limit of the juridical continental shelf is defined by fixed points, at each of which the thickness of sedimentary rocks is at least 1 % of the shortest distance from such point to the foot of the continental slope, fig. 3.


Fig. 3.

Such fixed points either defined by distance or by thickness formula must be separated by not more than 60 miles. The outer limit for the juridical continental shelf can not exceed 350 nautical miles from the baseline or 100 nautical miles from the 2.500 m isobath.

Limitation of the prolongation
The extension shall not exceed 350 nautical miles from the baseline from which the breadth of the territorial sea is measured, or shall not exceed 100 nautical miles from the 2.500 m isobath, which is a line connecting fixed points at a depth of 2.500 metres.

The national jurisdictions for the extended "juridical continental shelf" will apply to the nonliving resources of the seabed and its subsoil, and to sedentary living resources that dwell on the seafloor, thus the "juridical continental shelf" is not identical with the exclusive Economic Zone.
Such fixed points either defined by distance or by thickness formula must be separated by not more than 60 miles. The outer limit for the juridical continental shelf can not exceed 350 nautical miles from the baseline or 100 nautical miles from the 2.500 m isobath.

UN Commission for the Continental Shelf
Accordingly, there is a demand for comprehensive bathymetric mapping of the seafloor in the marine area north of Greenland, defining the shelf and the foot of the continental slope, which is the line along the base of the slope where the gradient of the seafloor undergoes its maximum change and additionally the 2.500 m isobath. Comprehensive seismic investigations are also needed to map the thickness of the sedimentary layers on the slope and the sea floor in the continental margin.

In 1997 the Commission for the Continental Shelf was established, responsible for giving advice concerning claims for extension of the continental shelf and evaluating the claims based upon presented scientific documentation. This commission has 21 members, covering internationally recognised experts in bathymetry, geophysics and/or geology. The decisions taken by the commission are binding. European states are represented by experts from Germany, Ireland and Norway.

After ratification of the Law of the Sea Convention the coastal state has 10 years to define the outer limits fof the "juridical continental shelf" and must present to the Commission the claim and relevant physiographic documentation for the extension exceeding the 200 nautical miles. This documentation has to be accepted by the Commission for the Continental Shelf.

As seen in fig. 4, the boundary line in West and East Greenland is defined as the equidistant line with neighbouring states or lines defined based on bilateral agreement.

In southern Greenland, where the continental margin is relatively narrow, the juridical shelf has a width of 200 nautical miles (app. 365 km) and will be identical with the exclusive economic zone, EEZ.

In North and Northeast Greenland the continental shelf seems to be a natural prolongation in the Morris Jesup Plateau and the Lomonosov Ridge. Accordingly Denmark has a demand for bathymetric, seismic and geophysical data collection in the sea North and Northeast of Greenland.


Fig. 4.

As seen in fig. 5, the physiographic continental shelf north of Norway incl. Svalbard and especially north of Russia, is very large, up to appr. 1000 nautical mile width, and thanks to Svalbard and the Russian Arctic archipelago, the Eurasian 200 miles economic zone might extend to the north, as indicated in the Canadian sketch shown at fig. 6. The physiographic continental shelf has much less width north of the American Continent comprising Alaska, Canada and Greenland.


Fig. 5.


Fig. 6.

The Geological Survey of Canada has started the geophysical program and has in 1994 presented their maximal claims in the Polar Sea as seen at fig. 6, which shows the possible prolongation outside the 200 nautical miles economic zone north of Canada.

For Denmark it is important to retrieve bathymetric and seismic data collected by other nations from Greenlandic waters and to build up a Greenlandic data base. At present several international scientific programmes are active in the Polar Sea (Arctic Submarine Science Program SCIEX; the IASC Bathymetric Data Base for the Arctic, Nansen Arctic Drilling Program, NAD; Arctic Climate System Study, ACYS; and Polar Margin Aeromagnetic Program, PMAP).

Danish participation in such projects gives Denmark possibility to collect some of the needed geophysical data, and then define the demand for Danish activity for further data collection needed for evaluation with respect to possible national Danish claims for prolongation of the continental shelf north and northeast of Greenland.

References:

Canada and Article 76 of the Law of the Sea. Geological Survey of Canada Open File 3209, 1994

Bach & Taagholt: Greenland and the Arctic Region - resources and security policy. The Information and Welfare Service of the Danish Defence. Copenhagen 1982.

Lilje-Jensen, Jørgen & Milan Tamsborg: The Role of Natural Prolongation in Relation to Shelf Determination beyond 200 Nautical Miles.

Nansen Arctic Drilling, Implementation Plan, 1997.

Seafloor Chraracterization and Mapping Pod, LamontDoherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, USA, August 1997.

Taagholt, Jørgen : International Law of the Sea - in an Arctic Perspective. Nordic Arctic Research on Contemporary Arctic Problems. Proceedings from Nordic Arctic Research Forum 1992, Aalborg University Press, 1992.

Verlaan, Philomene A. : New Seafloor Mapping Technology and Article 76 of the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea.